Maximilien
Given to 12,167 babies in France, 1900 to 2023. Every figure below is a count of birth registrations, not an estimate.
By register
By decade, every selected register together
Asked and held nothing for this name: Scotland (1974–2025), Ireland (1964–2025), Norway (1945–2025), Argentina (2012–2024), Greenland (2002–2025). That is not a count of nought — each of those registers was searched and does not carry this spelling. Every one withholds its smallest counts, on its own rule, so a name can be real there and still absent from what they publish.
Narrow these tables
The sum at the top of each table adds counts that were not made on the same rule — the Americans publish a name only where five or more babies were given it in a year, ONS redact any name given to two or fewer in total, Finland counts living citizens rather than births. It is an indication of how widely the name is recorded, not a measurement of how many people have it.
How it is said
Not recorded. The pronouncing dictionary used here has no entry for Maximilien. That does not mean the name has no settled pronunciation — it means the source is a dictionary of English words that happens to contain many names, and it is thinnest on names coined recently. Nothing is guessed here, because a guessed pronunciation of somebody's name is worse than none.
Where these numbers come from
United States, 1880 to 2025
As a boy's name, Maximilien was registered 371 times in the United States between 1980 and 2025, most often in the 2010s.
England and Wales, 1996 to 2025
181 babies, from a register that begins in 1996. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Office for National Statistics. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — ONS redact a name given to two or fewer babies in total, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Scotland
Not in this register. Maximilien does not appear in the Scottish figures for 1974 to 2025. NRS suppress any name given to two or fewer babies in a year, so this means the name was rare there rather than unknown.
Northern Ireland
On the register, with the number withheld. Maximilien appears in the Northern Irish figures in 1 year, and NISRA publish no count for any of them: the name went to fewer than three babies in each of those years, and they withhold the number rather than the name. That is not a count of nought — it is a name somebody was given.
NISRA fold accents before publishing, in their words: “Names containing accents have been recorded without those accents.” Only Scotland does the same. So a Northern Irish figure covers every accenting of a name and most of the figures beside it do not.
Ireland
Not in this register. Maximilien does not appear in the Irish figures for 1964 to 2025. The CSO list a name once it has reached three babies in any single year, so this means the name never did.
Norway
Not in this register. Maximilien does not appear in the Norwegian figures for 1945 to 2025. SSB list only names used by at least two hundred people in the previous year, so an absence here usually means the name was never that common in Norway rather than never used.
Sweden, 1998 to 2022
7 babies, from a register that begins in 1998. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistics Sweden, released under CC0, which asks for no credit at all. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — SCB withhold anything under two — and under ten before 2004, which is a different bar in the same table, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
The Swedish bar moved in 2004. Until 2003 a name was published only if ten or more babies of that sex were given it; from 2004, two. A Swedish column that looks thin in its first years is showing that rule, not a name becoming popular. The series also stops: SCB ceased producing name statistics in 2024, so 2022 is the last year there will be. And what it counts is a tilltalsnamn — the given name a person actually goes by — rather than every name on the register.
France, 1900 to 2023
12,167 babies, from a register that begins in 1900. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Insee. Licence Ouverte / Open Licence 2.0 (Etalab). The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Insee withhold the YEAR rather than the name, pooling the births of a name given to fewer than three babies of a sex in a year into one undated record, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Belgium
Counted, but not dated. Maximilien was given to 32 babies in Belgium, and not one of those births has a year published against it. Statbel publish one ten-year total per municipality and no year column at all, so there is nothing to date these births to. This is the whole of what they publish for this name.
Source: Statbel, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statbel apply their threshold of five separately in each of 545 municipalities, so a name given to four babies in each of fifty towns is published nowhere.
Belgium is the only register here with no years in it, so it appears on every page as a single figure. And that figure is a sum of municipal counts that each reached five on their own — a floor with a hole in the middle rather than at the edge.
Austria, 1984 to 2025
10 babies, from a register that begins in 1984. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistik Austria. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistik Austria withhold no count at all — where a name was given fewer than four times in a year they withhold the district instead, and publish the number, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Austria is the only column on this page that is a total rather than a floor: nothing is held back except which district a birth was in. Two things do limit it. It records first names only, so a child registered Anna Maria is an Anna. And its coverage widens twice — to 2009 it counts only babies with Austrian citizenship, from 2010 every baby born in Austria, and from 2015 also babies born abroad to mothers living there — so the later decades are larger partly by rule and not only by naming.
Austrian spellings are also partly folded. Statistik Austria transcode names so that spellings alike but for their marks come together, and the only marks that survive are the six German umlauts. So an Austrian figure for an unaccented spelling covers the accented ways of writing it as well, and the figures beside it do not.
Switzerland, 2000 to 2025
213 babies, from a register that begins in 2000. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Federal Statistical Office. Open use, source must be provided. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — the Federal Statistical Office withhold no count either — the smallest figure they publish is one baby — but they do not list every name, and about one Swiss baby in ten is given a name that is not on their list, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Switzerland suppresses no figure at all — a Swiss count of one is published as one — so what is missing here is never a small number. It is a name. The published lists hold 2,724 boys’ names and 2,628 girls’ names, against Austria’s 23,938 for a country of much the same size, and no rule is given for what puts a name on them. Rather than guess at the rule, here is the size of it measured: those names account for 69,993 of the 78,153 births the office reports for 2025.
Poland, 2000 to 2025
41 babies, from a register that begins in 2000. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: the Ministry of Digitisation, from the PESEL register. Dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0, which asks for no credit at all. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — the Polish threshold moved in the middle of its own series — a name given fewer than five times in a year was left out up to 2012, and fewer than two from 2013, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
The number of Polish names published went from 978 in 2012 to 1,979 in 2013. Polish naming did not double in a year: the bar moved from five to two. It is the same thing Sweden did in 2004, and the clearest reason on this page to distrust a jump in a count of names as against a count of babies.
Poland is the only register here that publishes a second given name separately, and both are counted, so a child registered Anna Maria is an Anna and a Maria. Second names appear only from 2019 while first names run from 2000 — 387,691 first names in 2019 against 560,227 once second names are added — so the Polish figures step up that year for a reason that belongs to what was published, not to what anyone was called. Surnames are never counted here, in any register.
Poland publishes its names in capitals — ZOFIA, JAKUB — and they are shown here in ordinary case. That is a change to what was published, and it is the only one made to any figure or name on this site.
Canada, 1991 to 2024
415 babies, from a register that begins in 1991. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistics Canada, table 17-10-0147-01. Adapted from Statistics Canada, First names at birth by sex at birth, 1991–2024. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistics Canada withhold any name given to fewer than five babies in a year, and publish no single-letter name — the same bar as the Americans, set by a different authority, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Canada is usually said not to have a national name register, because births are registered province by province and most published lists are provincial top tens stitched together. Statistics Canada do assemble them: this is one table for the whole country, built from the Canadian Vital Statistics birth database together with Retraite Québec’s list of names.
Argentina
Not in this register. Maximilien does not appear in the Argentine figures for 2012 to 2024. RENAPER publish a figure only where a name was given to at least two people, so this means it was rarer than that, or was given only outside 2012–2024.
Finland
Counted, but not dated. Maximilien is a name in force for 14 living Finnish citizens, and not one of them has a year of birth published against them. DVV publish no year of birth at all, so there is nothing to date this to. It is a census of names in use on 3 August 2026.
Source: Digital and Population Data Services Agency (DVV). Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — DVV publish no name held by fewer than five people, and apply that threshold separately to first names and to middle names.
The Finnish column is not a count of births, and it is the furthest from one on this site. DVV count the names in force of living Finnish citizens, resident in Finland or abroad. So somebody who has died is not counted at all; somebody who changed their name is counted under the new one; a Finnish citizen in Sydney is counted and a resident of Helsinki who is not a citizen is not. Every other register here counts an event in a territory.
And there are no years in it whatever — not a range trimmed for space, but no year column at all. What it is good at is breadth: DVV publish every name held by five or more people, first names and middle names alike, which is why Finland brings more names to this site than any register but the American and French ones. Surnames are published separately and are never used here.
Greenland
Not in this register. Maximilien does not appear in the Greenlandic figures for 2002 to 2025. Statistics Greenland suppress nothing, so — as with Austria — this means no resident of Greenland born since 2002 has the name, rather than that it was too rare to print.
The Social Security Administration publish the name on every United States birth registration from 1880 onward, and dedicate the data to the public domain under CC0. This page adds nothing to it: the counts are theirs, grouped by decade.
One gap, and it matters here more than anywhere. SSA publish a name only where five or more babies were given it in a year. A name you cannot find is not a name nobody used — it is a name used four times or fewer, and no site built on this data can see it.
Neither a meaning nor a pronunciation is recorded here for this name. Pronunciations come from the CMU Pronouncing Dictionary, which does not have every name; meanings are not on the site at all yet. Both gaps will be filled from named sources or left visible, rather than with something plausible.