Latoya
Given to 45,748 babies in the United States, 1960 to 2025. Every figure below is a count of birth registrations, not an estimate.
By register
By decade, every selected register together
Asked and held nothing for this name: Scotland (1974–2025), Norway (1945–2025), Belgium (2016–2025), Switzerland (2000–2025), Argentina (2012–2024), Finland (living citizens, 2026), Greenland (2002–2025). That is not a count of nought — each of those registers was searched and does not carry this spelling. Every one withholds its smallest counts, on its own rule, so a name can be real there and still absent from what they publish.
Narrow these tables
The sum at the top of each table adds counts that were not made on the same rule — the Americans publish a name only where five or more babies were given it in a year, ONS redact any name given to two or fewer in total, Finland counts living citizens rather than births. It is an indication of how widely the name is recorded, not a measurement of how many people have it.
How it is said
lətˈɔɪə
From the CMU Pronouncing Dictionary, free for any use. The symbols are IPA, converted from CMU's notation by the published correspondence. Two things in that conversion are ours rather than theirs: an unstressed vowel is written as a schwa, and the stress mark sits before the stressed vowel rather than at the start of its syllable — CMU record no syllable boundaries, so placing it properly would mean guessing where the syllables fall.
Where these numbers come from
United States, 1880 to 2025
As a girl's name, Latoya was registered 45,563 times in the United States between 1960 and 2025, most often in the 1980s.
As a boy's name, Latoya was registered 185 times in the United States between 1970 and 1999, most often in the 1980s.
England and Wales, 1996 to 2025
195 babies, from a register that begins in 1996. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Office for National Statistics. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — ONS redact a name given to two or fewer babies in total, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Scotland
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Scottish figures for 1974 to 2025. NRS suppress any name given to two or fewer babies in a year, so this means the name was rare there rather than unknown.
Northern Ireland
On the register, with the number withheld. Latoya appears in the Northern Irish figures in 10 separate years, and NISRA publish no count for any of them: the name went to fewer than three babies in each of those years, and they withhold the number rather than the name. That is not a count of nought — it is a name somebody was given.
NISRA fold accents before publishing, in their words: “Names containing accents have been recorded without those accents.” Only Scotland does the same. So a Northern Irish figure covers every accenting of a name and most of the figures beside it do not.
Ireland, 1964 to 2025
12 babies, from a register that begins in 1964. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Central Statistics Office. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — the CSO name a name once it reaches three in any single year and then leave every quieter year blank, so an Irish total is a floor, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Norway
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Norwegian figures for 1945 to 2025. SSB list only names used by at least two hundred people in the previous year, so an absence here usually means the name was never that common in Norway rather than never used.
Sweden, 1998 to 2022
2 babies, from a register that begins in 1998. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistics Sweden, released under CC0, which asks for no credit at all. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — SCB withhold anything under two — and under ten before 2004, which is a different bar in the same table, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
The Swedish bar moved in 2004. Until 2003 a name was published only if ten or more babies of that sex were given it; from 2004, two. A Swedish column that looks thin in its first years is showing that rule, not a name becoming popular. The series also stops: SCB ceased producing name statistics in 2024, so 2022 is the last year there will be. And what it counts is a tilltalsnamn — the given name a person actually goes by — rather than every name on the register.
France, 1900 to 2023
68 babies, from a register that begins in 1900. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Insee. Licence Ouverte / Open Licence 2.0 (Etalab). The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Insee withhold the YEAR rather than the name, pooling the births of a name given to fewer than three babies of a sex in a year into one undated record, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Belgium
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Belgian figures for 2016 to 2025. Statbel publish a figure only where at least five babies in a single municipality were given the name, so this means it never reached five in any one town — not that no Belgian child has it.
Austria, 1984 to 2025
3 babies, from a register that begins in 1984. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistik Austria. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistik Austria withhold no count at all — where a name was given fewer than four times in a year they withhold the district instead, and publish the number, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Austria is the only column on this page that is a total rather than a floor: nothing is held back except which district a birth was in. Two things do limit it. It records first names only, so a child registered Anna Maria is an Anna. And its coverage widens twice — to 2009 it counts only babies with Austrian citizenship, from 2010 every baby born in Austria, and from 2015 also babies born abroad to mothers living there — so the later decades are larger partly by rule and not only by naming.
Austrian spellings are also partly folded. Statistik Austria transcode names so that spellings alike but for their marks come together, and the only marks that survive are the six German umlauts. So an Austrian figure for an unaccented spelling covers the accented ways of writing it as well, and the figures beside it do not.
Switzerland
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Swiss figures for 2000 to 2025. the Federal Statistical Office publish a fixed list of first names and do not say how a name gets onto it. So this may mean the name was never given in Switzerland, or only that it is not on that list.
Poland, 2000 to 2025
23 babies, from a register that begins in 2000. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: the Ministry of Digitisation, from the PESEL register. Dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0, which asks for no credit at all. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — the Polish threshold moved in the middle of its own series — a name given fewer than five times in a year was left out up to 2012, and fewer than two from 2013, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
The number of Polish names published went from 978 in 2012 to 1,979 in 2013. Polish naming did not double in a year: the bar moved from five to two. It is the same thing Sweden did in 2004, and the clearest reason on this page to distrust a jump in a count of names as against a count of babies.
Poland is the only register here that publishes a second given name separately, and both are counted, so a child registered Anna Maria is an Anna and a Maria. Second names appear only from 2019 while first names run from 2000 — 387,691 first names in 2019 against 560,227 once second names are added — so the Polish figures step up that year for a reason that belongs to what was published, not to what anyone was called. Surnames are never counted here, in any register.
Poland publishes its names in capitals — ZOFIA, JAKUB — and they are shown here in ordinary case. That is a change to what was published, and it is the only one made to any figure or name on this site.
Canada, 1991 to 2024
125 babies, from a register that begins in 1991. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistics Canada, table 17-10-0147-01. Adapted from Statistics Canada, First names at birth by sex at birth, 1991–2024. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistics Canada withhold any name given to fewer than five babies in a year, and publish no single-letter name — the same bar as the Americans, set by a different authority, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Canada is usually said not to have a national name register, because births are registered province by province and most published lists are provincial top tens stitched together. Statistics Canada do assemble them: this is one table for the whole country, built from the Canadian Vital Statistics birth database together with Retraite Québec’s list of names.
Argentina
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Argentine figures for 2012 to 2024. RENAPER publish a figure only where a name was given to at least two people, so this means it was rarer than that, or was given only outside 2012–2024.
Finland
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Finnish figures at all. DVV publish a name only where at least five living Finnish citizens hold it, so this means fewer than five do — not that no Finn was ever given it.
Greenland
Not in this register. Latoya does not appear in the Greenlandic figures for 2002 to 2025. Statistics Greenland suppress nothing, so — as with Austria — this means no resident of Greenland born since 2002 has the name, rather than that it was too rare to print.
The Social Security Administration publish the name on every United States birth registration from 1880 onward, and dedicate the data to the public domain under CC0. This page adds nothing to it: the counts are theirs, grouped by decade.
One gap, and it matters here more than anywhere. SSA publish a name only where five or more babies were given it in a year. A name you cannot find is not a name nobody used — it is a name used four times or fewer, and no site built on this data can see it.
The pronunciation above comes from the CMU Pronouncing Dictionary, which covers some names and not others. Meanings are not here yet. When they arrive they will come from named scholarship old enough to be out of copyright, and where two authorities disagree the page will say so rather than picking one.