Aleida
Given to 2,121 babies in the United States, 1910 to 2025. Every figure below is a count of birth registrations, not an estimate.
By register
By decade, every selected register together
Asked and held nothing for this name: Scotland (1974–2025), Northern Ireland (1997–2025), Ireland (1964–2025), Norway (1945–2025), Sweden (1998–2022), France (1900–2023), Belgium (2016–2025), Switzerland (2000–2025), Poland (2000–2025). That is not a count of nought — each of those registers was searched and does not carry this spelling. Every one withholds its smallest counts, on its own rule, so a name can be real there and still absent from what they publish.
Narrow these tables
The sum at the top of each table adds counts that were not made on the same rule — the Americans publish a name only where five or more babies were given it in a year, ONS redact any name given to two or fewer in total, Finland counts living citizens rather than births. It is an indication of how widely the name is recorded, not a measurement of how many people have it.
How it is said
Not recorded. The pronouncing dictionary used here has no entry for Aleida. That does not mean the name has no settled pronunciation — it means the source is a dictionary of English words that happens to contain many names, and it is thinnest on names coined recently. Nothing is guessed here, because a guessed pronunciation of somebody's name is worse than none.
Where these numbers come from
United States, 1880 to 2025
As a girl's name, Aleida was registered 2,121 times in the United States between 1910 and 2025, most often in the 2010s.
England and Wales, 1996 to 2025
10 babies, from a register that begins in 1996. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Office for National Statistics. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — ONS redact a name given to two or fewer babies in total, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Scotland
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Scottish figures for 1974 to 2025. NRS suppress any name given to two or fewer babies in a year, so this means the name was rare there rather than unknown.
Northern Ireland
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Northern Irish figures for 1997 to 2025. NISRA print every name given to a baby registered there, so an absence here means the name does not appear at all between 1997 and 2025.
Ireland
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Irish figures for 1964 to 2025. The CSO list a name once it has reached three babies in any single year, so this means the name never did.
Norway
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Norwegian figures for 1945 to 2025. SSB list only names used by at least two hundred people in the previous year, so an absence here usually means the name was never that common in Norway rather than never used.
Sweden
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Swedish figures for 1998 to 2022. SCB published a name only where at least two babies of that sex were given it, and at least ten before 2004, so this means the name never cleared that bar.
France
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the French figures for 1900 to 2023. Insee list a name individually only where it was given at least 20 times to one sex, over 1900-1945 or over 1946-2023; rarer names are pooled into a single record they call _PRENOMS_RARES. So this means the name was rare there rather than unknown.
Belgium
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Belgian figures for 2016 to 2025. Statbel publish a figure only where at least five babies in a single municipality were given the name, so this means it never reached five in any one town — not that no Belgian child has it.
Austria, 1984 to 2025
6 babies, from a register that begins in 1984. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistik Austria. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistik Austria withhold no count at all — where a name was given fewer than four times in a year they withhold the district instead, and publish the number, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Austria is the only column on this page that is a total rather than a floor: nothing is held back except which district a birth was in. Two things do limit it. It records first names only, so a child registered Anna Maria is an Anna. And its coverage widens twice — to 2009 it counts only babies with Austrian citizenship, from 2010 every baby born in Austria, and from 2015 also babies born abroad to mothers living there — so the later decades are larger partly by rule and not only by naming.
Austrian spellings are also partly folded. Statistik Austria transcode names so that spellings alike but for their marks come together, and the only marks that survive are the six German umlauts. So an Austrian figure for an unaccented spelling covers the accented ways of writing it as well, and the figures beside it do not.
Switzerland
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Swiss figures for 2000 to 2025. the Federal Statistical Office publish a fixed list of first names and do not say how a name gets onto it. So this may mean the name was never given in Switzerland, or only that it is not on that list.
Poland
Not in this register. Aleida does not appear in the Polish figures for 2000 to 2025. the Ministry left out any name given fewer than five times in a year up to 2012, and fewer than two from 2013. So an absence in the early years is a weaker statement than an absence in the later ones.
Canada, 1991 to 2024
9 babies, from a register that begins in 1991. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistics Canada, table 17-10-0147-01. Adapted from Statistics Canada, First names at birth by sex at birth, 1991–2024. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistics Canada withhold any name given to fewer than five babies in a year, and publish no single-letter name — the same bar as the Americans, set by a different authority, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Canada is usually said not to have a national name register, because births are registered province by province and most published lists are provincial top tens stitched together. Statistics Canada do assemble them: this is one table for the whole country, built from the Canadian Vital Statistics birth database together with Retraite Québec’s list of names.
Argentina, 2012 to 2024
80 people on the register, from a register that begins in 2012. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: RENAPER, the Dirección Nacional de Población. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — RENAPER publish no count below two, and publish no sex at all — the column here is every baby, not girls and boys apart, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Two things about the Argentine column are unlike every other on this page. RENAPER publish no sex: their file with a sex column holds 169 names, and the one used here holds 14,917 and does not say. Splitting a figure between girls and boys would invent the only thing it leaves out, so the column is simply everybody.
And it counts the living, not births registered. RENAPER count people nacidas vivas e identificadas
— born alive and holding a document — as the register stood in September 2024. So a 2012 figure is how many people born that year were still on the register twelve years later, not how many babies were registered then. Anyone who died, or never received a document, is not counted. Every other register on this site counts the birth itself.
One more difference, and this one is a gain: Argentina counts every given name, so a child called María Sofía is a María and a Sofía. Surnames are never counted here, in any register.
Finland
Counted, but not dated. Aleida is a name in force for 11 living Finnish citizens, and not one of them has a year of birth published against them. DVV publish no year of birth at all, so there is nothing to date this to. It is a census of names in use on 3 August 2026.
Source: Digital and Population Data Services Agency (DVV). Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — DVV publish no name held by fewer than five people, and apply that threshold separately to first names and to middle names.
The Finnish column is not a count of births, and it is the furthest from one on this site. DVV count the names in force of living Finnish citizens, resident in Finland or abroad. So somebody who has died is not counted at all; somebody who changed their name is counted under the new one; a Finnish citizen in Sydney is counted and a resident of Helsinki who is not a citizen is not. Every other register here counts an event in a territory.
And there are no years in it whatever — not a range trimmed for space, but no year column at all. What it is good at is breadth: DVV publish every name held by five or more people, first names and middle names alike, which is why Finland brings more names to this site than any register but the American and French ones. Surnames are published separately and are never used here.
Greenland, 2002 to 2025
1 residents, from a register that begins in 2002. Its decades cannot be compared with the American ones, which reach back to 1880: where the two tables above put them in the same row, they are counting different lengths of record.
Source: Statistics Greenland, bank.stat.gl. Free to reproduce, commercial use included, with attribution. The registers withhold small counts on different rules — Statistics Greenland withhold nothing at all — their smallest published figure is 1, so no name and no number is held back for being rare, and the Americans hide one given to fewer than five in a year — so a name in one table and not another may only have met different thresholds.
Greenland counts residents, not births. Statistics Greenland's population register holds the names of everyone resident on 1 July, and this column arranges them by year of birth. So a 2002 figure is how many people born that year were living in Greenland when the register was last read — not how many babies were born there. Anyone who has left, or died, is not counted; anyone who arrived is. Argentina's column is the same shape.
It hides nothing, which only Austria can also say: the smallest figure they publish is 1. And it carries a category no other register here has — Ikke-navngivet, not named. Greenlandic children are often on the register before they are named, so each birth year is read nine years on, by which point fewer than two in a hundred are still unnamed. Read a year after birth instead, that figure is closer to a third.
First forenames only. Greenland publish a second forename nowhere, so unlike Poland and Finland there are no middle names in this column. Surnames they do publish, and this site never uses them.
The Social Security Administration publish the name on every United States birth registration from 1880 onward, and dedicate the data to the public domain under CC0. This page adds nothing to it: the counts are theirs, grouped by decade.
One gap, and it matters here more than anywhere. SSA publish a name only where five or more babies were given it in a year. A name you cannot find is not a name nobody used — it is a name used four times or fewer, and no site built on this data can see it.
Neither a meaning nor a pronunciation is recorded here for this name. Pronunciations come from the CMU Pronouncing Dictionary, which does not have every name; meanings are not on the site at all yet. Both gaps will be filled from named sources or left visible, rather than with something plausible.